А я и по ебалу дам с радостью любой охуевшей морде :)
Конечно, Смит нихуя не знал и ничо не значит. И он даже никому не известен - никто не считает его главным либералом и адвокатом капитализма и постоянно не цитирует по делу и не по делу.
"Smith gives justice priority over the other virtues in TMS (86), he begins his lectures on jurisprudence by saying that the maintenance of justice is “the first and chief design of every system of government” (Smith 1978, p. 5), and he brings in justice as a constraint on economic activity many times in WN (e.g., WN 157, 539, 687). But he does not say that the enforcement of justice is the sole job of government. The third of the tasks he gives to government in WN consists in “maintaining and erecting” a broad range of “publick works and … publick institutions” for the good of the whole society (WN 687–8). In TMS, the chapter often quoted as claiming that justice is the only virtue that may be enforced actually maintains only that “kindness or beneficence, … cannot, among equals, be extorted by force” (TMS 81). In a state “antecedent to the institution of civil government,” Smith says, no impartial spectator would approve of one person's using force to make another act beneficently. But once civil government has been established, people may legitimately be forced to carry out at least the greatest and most obvious duties of beneficence. Smith says that
[t]he civil magistrate is entrusted with the power not only of … restraining injustice, but of promoting the prosperity of the commonwealth, by establishing good discipline, and by discouraging every sort of vice and impropriety; he may prescribe rules, therefore, which not only prohibit mutual injuries among fellow-citizens, but command mutual good offices to a certain degree. (81, my emphasis)
Smith warns against taking this license for a general promotion of virtue too far—that, he says, would be “destructive of all liberty, security, and justice”—but he also says that neglecting it will lead “to many gross disorders and shocking enormities” (TMS 81).These enormities may well include the misery of the poor, a central concern of Smith's in WN. Smith had no principled objections to government power being used to help the poor, and indeed proposed a number of policies with that in mind. "
"будучи в здравом уме в одну фразу воткнуть вот это:
"..Либералы - поборники святого права частной собственности , предпринимательства, бизнеса, рыночного обмена.." и это: "..государственного регулирования экономики.."
- это надо быть в сумеречном состоянии души. "
- это надо знать, о чём говоришь. И любой безграмотному нигге показывать, что он не знает самых основ... всего.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2016-04-06 05:20 pm (UTC)Конечно, Смит нихуя не знал и ничо не значит. И он даже никому не известен - никто не считает его главным либералом и адвокатом капитализма и постоянно не цитирует по делу и не по делу.
"Smith gives justice priority over the other virtues in TMS (86), he begins his lectures on jurisprudence by saying that the maintenance of justice is “the first and chief design of every system of government” (Smith 1978, p. 5), and he brings in justice as a constraint on economic activity many times in WN (e.g., WN 157, 539, 687). But he does not say that the enforcement of justice is the sole job of government. The third of the tasks he gives to government in WN consists in “maintaining and erecting” a broad range of “publick works and … publick institutions” for the good of the whole society (WN 687–8). In TMS, the chapter often quoted as claiming that justice is the only virtue that may be enforced actually maintains only that “kindness or beneficence, … cannot, among equals, be extorted by force” (TMS 81). In a state “antecedent to the institution of civil government,” Smith says, no impartial spectator would approve of one person's using force to make another act beneficently. But once civil government has been established, people may legitimately be forced to carry out at least the greatest and most obvious duties of beneficence. Smith says that
[t]he civil magistrate is entrusted with the power not only of … restraining injustice, but of promoting the prosperity of the commonwealth, by establishing good discipline, and by discouraging every sort of vice and impropriety; he may prescribe rules, therefore, which not only prohibit mutual injuries among fellow-citizens, but command mutual good offices to a certain degree. (81, my emphasis)
Smith warns against taking this license for a general promotion of virtue too far—that, he says, would be “destructive of all liberty, security, and justice”—but he also says that neglecting it will lead “to many gross disorders and shocking enormities” (TMS 81). These enormities may well include the misery of the poor, a central concern of Smith's in WN. Smith had no principled objections to government power being used to help the poor, and indeed proposed a number of policies with that in mind. "
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/smith-moral-political/
Так что чтобы :
"будучи в здравом уме в одну фразу воткнуть вот это:
"..Либералы - поборники святого права частной собственности , предпринимательства, бизнеса, рыночного обмена.."
и это:
"..государственного регулирования экономики.."
- это надо быть в сумеречном состоянии души. "
- это надо знать, о чём говоришь. И любой безграмотному нигге показывать, что он не знает самых основ... всего.